• Advertise with us
  • Blog with us
  • Current Deals:

    50% off: Dicks Sporting Goods
    Win Free Fishing Tackle

    $40 off P&S Fishing: Coupon Code NV4

    Vermont - Daily Bag Limit - Fish talk

    Archive for the 'Vermont' Category

    Grayghost Prod. To Release Fly Fishing Movie – “East by Northeast”

    We’ve all been waiting anxiously for the brand new production of the fly fishing movie, “East by Northeast”, created by Carter Davidson and his able staff at Grayghost Productions, LLC.

    Due to be released this month, the following movie trailer has been made available to wet our appetites.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 3rd February 2009
    Under: Canada, Fishing, Fly Fishing, Maine, New Hampshire, Podcast/Vcast, Vermont | No Comments »

    27th LCI Father’s Day Derby Presented By Yamaha

    Fishing DerbyEarly Bird Special Drawing

    One Week Left

    Register by March 31 for your chance at a Florida deep-sea fishing getaway for two with Costa Del Mar

    Click here to Register Today!

    Other New Highlights for 2008

    MONSTER MONEY
    $280,000 up for grabs with the CASH EXTRAS and SUPER BONUS CASH

    CASH EXTRAS
    $50,000 WIZN Magic Salmon & $50,000 WOKO You Bet Your Bass
    $27,000 Lakeshore Ace Laker
    $27,000 Slim Jim Walleye
    $27,000 Ray’s Seafood Sheepshead
    $27,000 R&L Archery Northern Pike
    $27,000 Shelburne Camping Bowfin
    $27,000 Sportsman Cottages Catfish

    Super Bonus Cash
    Cold, Cool and Warm Water Divisions (2007 Winners Split $19,480.40)

    PLUS …

    • Sign up a T.E.A.M. for your chance for one of THREE Starcraft boats, all equipped with a Yamaha 4-Stroke Outboard. Each first-place T.E.A.M wins one.
    • Nearly 150 Awards, including 70 places in the Species Categories, plus another 30 Junior places, and over 35 raffles with hundreds of drawings
    • Sign up a new angler for a chance at a Fly-In Fishing Trip from Berthelot Lake Lodge
    • Find Your Way Home With Lowrance in the Long Distance Lottery
    • Win a “Learn to Fish” Fins N’ Grins Striper Charter with the Loser Lottery
    • First place Juniors win a new Starcraft boat
    • $1,000 Crazy Carp Challenge presented by Cabot Cheese
    • The LCI Father’s Day Derby will end at 4 p.m. on June 16th, 2008
    • Register online at a discount

    Click here to Register Today!

    See the 2008 LCI Gazette or LCI Father’s Day Fishing Derby Rules & Regulations for complete details.

    Please call or write with questions. Visit www.lciderby.com. Call 802.879.3466
    or write info@lciderby.com

    Thank you for fishing Lake Champlain International, Inc.’s premiere fundraising fishing derby For more information on LCI’s projects visit http://www.lciderby.com/projects.shtml.

    Posted by Tom Remington

    Posted on 25th March 2008
    Under: Events, Fishing, New York, Vermont | No Comments »

    Fly Fishing – “Most Noble Form Of Fishing”?

    I probably shouldn’t even be giving this any ink but it has stirred at my inner being for most of the night and morning today, so I figure I better get it off my chest so I can move on.

    Didymo, didymosphenia geminata or rock snot, is a nasty invasive algae that can cripple a trout stream. As it grows it is often described as looking like toilet paper stuck to the bottom of crystal clear and fast moving waters – ideal for trout. As the “snot” grows, it can destroy the aquatic life that trout feed on and just as importantly is sends the aquatic ecosystem into disarray.

    Recently, didymo was confirmed as being in existence in the Upper Connecticut River, some prime trout habitat and a popular fishery as well as being frequented by canoers and kayakers. Shortly after this discovery, didymo was again found on the White River in Vermont and the most recent discovery occurring on the Batten Kill River in Vermont and at the border of New York State.

    Not to sound like an alarmist or a defeatist but it may be safe to say the the waters of New England are beginning to take a hit from this invasive species. What overall impact this will have on our trout waters and economies remains to be seen.

    When the first announcement came about the discovery of didymo in the Connecticut River, what I saw in my movement around the Internet were fishermen clamoring to get the word out. As a matter of fact some groups and individuals hustled around to get up signs in an effort to alert the people and hand out fliers with instructions on how to help stop the spread of this algae. This effort all done ahead of the efforts by state officials.

    What I didn’t see or hear was bickering among sportsmen about whose fault it was, or who was going to be the ones to take credit for getting the word out. It was more of a unified effort. Any discussions about how didymo got to the waters of northern New England and how it is spreading were done with the attitude of education and enlightenment. I for one knew very little about didymo prior to this.

    Yesterday, I was alerted to a thread that was posted at the forums of Fly Fishing in Maine. Although I have been a member of the Fly Fishing in Maine forums for quite some time, I almost never post there but like many places I frequent, I do so to read and find out what sportsmen are talking about. I have no ill feelings toward the website, its owners, administrators or members. Had a post like this shown up on my own website, I would have reacted in the same manner.

    As I said at the beginning of this article, I shouldn’t be giving this my time but I feel it needs to be pointed out that in my opinion, the vast majority of fishermen, no matter what kind of rod they use or bait they cast, don’t feel as this person does. Here’s the post.

    It is often said that fly fishing is the most noble form of our sport. Not only do we take fishing to an art form, but the majority of us show our target species and their ecosystems the utmost respect. Enter Didymo – our community takes up arms to defend against this paralyzing threat.
    But what about the average joe tossing his worm on a hook? Is he aware and does he care?
    Fishing is a leisure activity and its finest appeal is the relaxation it affords our tired bodies and souls. We work and toil our lives away and fishing gives us a moment of respite from the turmoil of life.
    Who wants to interrupt this relaxation with hours of cleaning equipment, exchanging felt soles for rubber, navigating waterways to eliminate fishing infected areas, etc. The fly-fisherman will do this happily, because we know what’s at stake.
    What about the rest?

    It is troubling that there are actually individuals alive on this planet that believe that because they cast a fly onto the water, they are somehow more “noble” than let’s say someone opting to drown a worm. American Heritage Dictionary defines noble as 1. Of, in, or belonging to the nobility. 2. Having or showing qualities of high moral character…. 3. Superior in nature or character; exalted: a noble ideal.

    When a person chooses to take up fly fishing, I would like to think they do it because of the challenges and enjoyment they get from all aspects of the sport not because they are looking to become an elite member of the fly fishing fraternity that thinks others don’t care. There is nothing wrong with wanting to fly fish. There is nothing wrong with spending gobs of money to enjoy the sport. There is nothing wrong with buying a Zebco rod and reel at Wal-Mart of $9.95, digging some worms out back and heading down to the local brook and catching the night’s supper. In my opinion both disciplines are “noble” when compared to many other things our society indulges in.

    When we begin assuming attitudes of superiority, nobility and grandeur all because we think we are better than another because of how we choose to fish, it is a sad day for all outdoor sportsmen. We see all too often these days such attitudes more geared for the promotion of our own special interests than for what’s good for all, including the fisheries we all strive to protect.

    For this person to suggest that because he is a member of an elite group of “noble” fishermen, he and his fellow anglers are the only ones who care enough to want to do anything about didymo, is absolutely absurd. It makes you wonder what other thoughts this person has toward his fellow man.

    The most encouraging part of this post comes from the responses that follow. As of this writing there were 11 responses and not one of them agreed. I don’t for one minute believe that the majority or even a small minority of fishermen at Fly Fishing in Maine honestly feel that spinning rod fishermen don’t care whether didymo grows and spreads in New England waters. We all have differing ideas on how best to manage our fisheries and often times, as has been displayed during the latest legislative session, ideas clash and emotions run high. This debate is far better than sportsmen sitting at home not getting involved at all. It shows more and more of us care and are willing to step up to the microphone and be heard. Let the debating continue but posts like this one do absolutely nothing to further the cause of understanding and preventing the spread of this and other invasive species.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 13th August 2007
    Under: Connecticut, Fishing, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Opinion/Commentary, Vermont | 7 Comments »

    Rock Snot Shows Up In The Batten Kill River In Vermont

    This is certainly not good news as researchers have discovered the presence of didymo in the Batten Kill river on a stretch near West Arlington. Scientists believe it has been growing there for about one year.

    This makes three bodies of water where the deadly algae has been found in Vermont waters. The Upper Connecticut River and the White River are the two others discovered only a short time ago.

    Read more here.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 7th August 2007
    Under: Fishing, Fishing Science, Vermont | No Comments »

    Maine Slow To Get Information Out On Didymo

    When I reported here of the confirmed outbreak of didymo on the Upper Connecticut River and the White Rivers in Vermont, I was a few days late in doing so. Now it is nearly two weeks since then and Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife are just starting to get the word out to its fishermen.

    This from Mark Latti of MDIFW.

    First Northeast Infestation of “Didymo” Discovered In Vermont

    Invasive could threaten Maine’s Pristine Rivers and Streams. Maine to combat potential infestation with strategy of Check, Clean and Dry.

    AUGUSTA, Maine – With the discovery of the aquatic nuisance algae known commonly as “didymo” or “rock snot” on the Vermont/New Hampshire Border in the Connecticut River, the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and the Maine Department of Environmental Protection are alerting boaters, anglers, kayakers, canoeists and others to take action to prevent this new invasive threat to Maine’s waters.

    The confirmed discovery in Bloomfield, Vermont is the first official report of Didymosphenia geminata in the Northeastern United States.

    Didymo can form extensive ‘blooms’ on the bottoms of rocky river beds, essentially smothering aquatic life forms such as macroinvertebrates (aquatic insects), native algae, and other organisms. Additionally, the physical appearance of the bloom is aesthetically unpleasing, and can reduce the recreational values of a waterbody. Didymo uses stalks to attach to rocks and plants in a river system. The diatom creates these stalks, which can form masses 10-12 inches thick on the river bottom, and trail for lengths of 2-3 feet in the current.

    “Didymo can be spread by transporting a single cell, it forms dense mats, which can kill aquatic insect life, essentially starving out fish populations in the area,” said John Boland, Director of Fisheries for IFW. “The ease with which it can be spread is a real concern for anyone who enjoys Maine’s waters. All of Maine’s rivers and streams are at risk.”

    Both IFW and DEP are urging anglers and other water recreationists to use these procedures for preventing the introduction and spread of didymo: Check, Clean and Dry.

    o Check: Before leaving a river or stream, remove all obvious clumps of algae and look for hidden clumps. Leave them at the affected site. If you find any later, do not wash them down drains; dispose all material in the trash.
    o Clean: Soak and scrub all items for at least one minute in hot (140 degrees F) water, a two percent solution of household bleach or a five percent solution of salt, antiseptic hand cleaner or dishwashing detergent.
    o Dry: If cleaning is not practical, after the item is completely dry to touch, wait an additional 48 hours before contact or use in any other waterway.

    “These steps are more than suggestions,” said IFW’s John Boland. “They’re absolutely essential for preserving the quality of Maine rivers and streams.”

    There are currently no known methods for controlling or eradicating didymo once it infests a water body. “Preventing the spread of Didymo is our best defense,” said Tom Danielson, a biologist with the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. “We have tested algae at over two hundred locations on Maine rivers and streams, and it has not yet been detected in Maine’s waters.”

    Didymo is generally found in colder, low nutrient, high clarity streams. However, recently there have been discoveries of Didymo in rivers and streams in warmer climates, as well as streams with more nutrients, streams with moderate clarities and even some tannic (tea colored) waters. Didymo is currently found in Europe (Scotland, Poland) and it is spreading throughout the northwestern region of the US. It is also in Quebec, British Columbia and New Zealand.

    In the past several years, didymo has expanded its range in the Western United States and has infested rivers and streams in several southeastern states, including Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee and North Carolina.

    In 2004, didymo was discovered in New Zealand. Within 18 months it had spread to 12 rivers on the South Island, forming nuisance blooms at several locations. New Zealand officials have instituted severe penalties for intentional spread of the algae, and are intensively researching control and prevention methods.

    If you feel that you have discovered didymo, please contact the Maine Department of Environmental Protection at 1-800-452-1942 or email milfoil@maine.gov.

    # # #

    For more information, please visit the following resources on the Web:

    EPA http://www.epa.gov/region8/water/didymosphenia/

    Biosecurity New Zealand http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/didymo

    New Hampshire Didymo Identification and FAQ
    http://www.des.state.nh.us/wmb/exoticspecies/didymo/identify_didymo.htm

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 25th July 2007
    Under: Fishing, Fishing Science, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont | 1 Comment »

    Who To Contact About Didymo Sightings In N.H. And Vt.

    The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services has posted a page at their website with contact information as to who to notify should you find outbreaks of the invasive algae, Didymo.

    Sightings in New Hampshire
    NH DES Limnology Center
    29 Hazen Drive
    Concord, NH 03301
    603-271-2248 or 603-271-3414
    asmagula@des.state.nh.us
    or
    jconnor@des.state.nh.us

    Sightings in Vermont
    Didymo identification, Water Quality Division
    103 S. Main St., Bldg 10N, First Floor
    Waterbury VT 05671-0408
    (802) 241 – 3770 or 241 – 3777
    Angela.Shambaugh@state.vt.us
    or
    Leslie.Matthews@state.vt.us

    The site also contains information about the species and what can be done to stop the spread of the deadly algae.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 19th July 2007
    Under: Connecticut, Fishing, Fishing Science, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont | No Comments »

    Sign Campaign Underway To Stem Spread Of Didymo

    With the confirmation of the presence of didymo, a deadly algae, in the Upper Connecticut River and portions of the White River near Bethel, Vermont, officials will begin a sign campaign. Signs will be placed at boat launch sites, etc. to educate the public on how to avoid spreading this algae.

    When officials get there with their signs, they may find some already put up by concerned fisherman who didn’t want to wait.

    The Boston Globe has more on this.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 14th July 2007
    Under: Connecticut, Fishing, Fishing Science, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont | No Comments »

    Eastern U.S. Strategy For Brook Trout Coservation

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The future of the East’s premier native trout is looking up, thanks to a coalition of state and federal agencies, academic institutions and conservation organizations.

    The Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture today released a first-of-its-kind conservation strategy to restore healthy, fishable populations of eastern brook trout throughout their eastern native range. The Conservation Strategy is based on the status and threats information contained in the Joint Venture’s initial report, which was issued in May 2006.

    The 2006 report found that only 5% of historical brook trout habitat remains intact. Populations have been eliminated or greatly reduced in almost half of the areas that historically supported brook trout. Poor land management practices are responsible for the majority of this decline.

    “Once the partnership recognized the threats facing brook trout within its historic eastern range, we developed regional and range-wide strategies to take swift and deliberate steps to conserve strong populations and restore weaker ones,” said Steve Perry, Inland Fisheries Division Chief for the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department and Chair of the Joint Venture. “We created a model for fish conservation – a large-scale, habitat-focused conservation strategy for a species at risk. This strategy provides us with a roadmap to significantly improve brook trout populations by 2025.”

    The report contains a set of aggressive range-wide and regional targets, including protection of highest quality habitat, improvement of 30% of damaged brook trout watersheds, and reintroduction of brook trout to 10% of those watersheds where they have disappeared. Using the 2006 status and threats data as a baseline, the Joint Venture will evaluate progress toward these targets at five year intervals.

    In conjunction with the range-wide strategy released today, each of the Joint Venture states is developing a specialized plan based on that state’s existing brook trout populations and dominant threats. Through these plans, the states will prioritize protection and restoration efforts to meet the collective targets outlined above. Projects will address priority needs in each state, ranging from restoring streamside habitat in Georgia to cleaning up pollution from abandoned coal mines in Pennsylvania, to fixing road culverts to improve brook trout passage in Maine.

    “The significance of these state efforts really can’t be overstated,” said Gary Berti, Eastern Brook Trout Campaign Coordinator for Trout Unlimited and the Joint Venture’s Communications Chair. “They are the ones who will do the hard work to make this range-wide plan a reality. And they will need support from conservation groups, watershed associations, landowners, businesses, educators, citizens and policy-makers at all levels to accomplish the ambitious goals laid out in this strategy.”

    The Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture partnership began in 2004 as a pilot project under the National Fish Habitat Action Plan. Active partners include fish and wildlife agencies from 17 states, federal agencies, conservation organizations and academic institutions. The Joint Venture is seeking additional partners and support to assist in the protection and restoration of brook trout habitat.

    Brook trout are the only trout native to the streams and rivers of the eastern United States. Once prolific throughout their historical range, brook trout populations have declined as land use changes have altered their habitat. These fish survive in only the coldest and cleanest water, and they serve as excellent indicators of the health of the watersheds they inhabit.

    For more information on the range-wide eastern brook trout conservation strategy and state-specific plans, please visit http://www.easternbrooktrout.net.

    This press release was sent to me by the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 7th March 2007
    Under: Connecticut, Fishing, Fishing Politics, Fishing Science, Georgia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia | No Comments »

    The Battenkill Will NOT Be Stocked With Sterile Trout

    It’s official! The state fish and wildlife announced officially that it has decided not to stock the Battenkill River watershed with sterile rainbow trout. After much discussion and public input, it was pretty much believed the fish and game would refrain from the stocking but now it has been declared official.

    These links will take you to previous stories about the event.

    To Stock Or Not Stock The Battenkill?
    Orvis And Others Threaten To Stop Fundraising For Battenkill Restoration
    Battenkill Crowd Says No To Stocking Proposal
    Vermont Officials Will Back Off Stocking Battenkill

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 20th January 2007
    Under: Fishing, Fishing Politics, Fishing Science, Vermont | No Comments »

    Trout Unlimited Looks At New Englands Water Sources

    Trout Unlimited has issued a report called, “A Glass Half Full: The Future of Water in New England”. This report takes a look at the future of water resources to support aquatic life in the New England area. As the demand for water grows, TU feels that guidelines need to be drawn up now to deal with over use of water that threatens our fisheries. The report addresses what TU sees as problems and makes recommendations on how to deal with them.

    The full report is available by clicking this link. On this page, you will be able to download the full report. It is a pdf.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 18th December 2006
    Under: Connecticut, Fishing, Fishing Science, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont | No Comments »

    To Stock Or Not Stock The Battenkill?

    As Vermont officials weigh the evidence, listen to comments from fisherman and fishing groups, the debate lingers on whether stocking the Battenkill River in Vermont with sterile rainbow trout is the best science or the term most often used is best management practice. (scroll down for previous articles on the Battenkill)

    Yesterday, Wilson Ring had an article in the Boston Globe that shed a little more light on what has happened to the Battekill over the centuries, what is being done and how residents, fishermen, businesses and biologists feel about the river and the prospects of stocking it.

    *Previous articles*

    Orvis And Others Threaten To Stop Fundraising For Battenkill Restoration
    Battenkill Crowd Says No To Stocking Proposal
    Vermont Officials Will Back Off Stocking Battenkill

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 23rd October 2006
    Under: Fishing, Fishing Politics, Fishing Science, Vermont | 1 Comment »

    Vermont Officials Will Back Off Stocking Battenkill

    Vermont officials are saying they have taken heed to the objections of Vermonters and will back off from their proposal to stock sterile rainbow trout into the Battenkill.

    *Previous Posts On This Subject*

    Battenkill Crowd Says No To Stocking Proposal
    Orvis And Others Threaten To Stop Fundraising For Battenkill Restoration

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 26th September 2006
    Under: Fishing, Vermont | 3 Comments »