• Advertise with us
  • Blog with us
  • Current Deals:

    50% off: Dicks Sporting Goods
    Win Free Fishing Tackle

    $40 off P&S Fishing: Coupon Code NV4

    Massachusetts - Daily Bag Limit - Fish talk

    Archive for the 'Massachusetts' Category

    Make Money With Catch And Release Ice Fishing

    The Great Barrington Fish & Game Club in Massachusetts thinks they have a way to encourage catch and release ice fishing for an upcoming fishing derby on nearby Mercer’s Pond.

    Anyone who catches a bass weighing 2 pounds or more and brings it live to the derby weighing table wins a $10 gift certificate to Taft’s Tackle Shop. Once weighed in, the bass must be released live into a nearby hole which has been cut into the ice. If the bass cannot be released alive, then the deal is off.

    This is a win-win situation for all. The angler receives the $10 certificate even though he may not have won the contest; the contest winner who caught the largest bass gets the certificate, the first place prize and bragging rights; and the fish is allowed to live and free to spawn in June and maybe fight a lucky fisherman next summer.

    At least this is an optional thing and not being forced onto those who just might want to keep their catch.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 28th January 2008
    Under: Fishing, Ice Fishing, Massachusetts | 2 Comments »

    Fly Fishing – “Most Noble Form Of Fishing”?

    I probably shouldn’t even be giving this any ink but it has stirred at my inner being for most of the night and morning today, so I figure I better get it off my chest so I can move on.

    Didymo, didymosphenia geminata or rock snot, is a nasty invasive algae that can cripple a trout stream. As it grows it is often described as looking like toilet paper stuck to the bottom of crystal clear and fast moving waters – ideal for trout. As the “snot” grows, it can destroy the aquatic life that trout feed on and just as importantly is sends the aquatic ecosystem into disarray.

    Recently, didymo was confirmed as being in existence in the Upper Connecticut River, some prime trout habitat and a popular fishery as well as being frequented by canoers and kayakers. Shortly after this discovery, didymo was again found on the White River in Vermont and the most recent discovery occurring on the Batten Kill River in Vermont and at the border of New York State.

    Not to sound like an alarmist or a defeatist but it may be safe to say the the waters of New England are beginning to take a hit from this invasive species. What overall impact this will have on our trout waters and economies remains to be seen.

    When the first announcement came about the discovery of didymo in the Connecticut River, what I saw in my movement around the Internet were fishermen clamoring to get the word out. As a matter of fact some groups and individuals hustled around to get up signs in an effort to alert the people and hand out fliers with instructions on how to help stop the spread of this algae. This effort all done ahead of the efforts by state officials.

    What I didn’t see or hear was bickering among sportsmen about whose fault it was, or who was going to be the ones to take credit for getting the word out. It was more of a unified effort. Any discussions about how didymo got to the waters of northern New England and how it is spreading were done with the attitude of education and enlightenment. I for one knew very little about didymo prior to this.

    Yesterday, I was alerted to a thread that was posted at the forums of Fly Fishing in Maine. Although I have been a member of the Fly Fishing in Maine forums for quite some time, I almost never post there but like many places I frequent, I do so to read and find out what sportsmen are talking about. I have no ill feelings toward the website, its owners, administrators or members. Had a post like this shown up on my own website, I would have reacted in the same manner.

    As I said at the beginning of this article, I shouldn’t be giving this my time but I feel it needs to be pointed out that in my opinion, the vast majority of fishermen, no matter what kind of rod they use or bait they cast, don’t feel as this person does. Here’s the post.

    It is often said that fly fishing is the most noble form of our sport. Not only do we take fishing to an art form, but the majority of us show our target species and their ecosystems the utmost respect. Enter Didymo – our community takes up arms to defend against this paralyzing threat.
    But what about the average joe tossing his worm on a hook? Is he aware and does he care?
    Fishing is a leisure activity and its finest appeal is the relaxation it affords our tired bodies and souls. We work and toil our lives away and fishing gives us a moment of respite from the turmoil of life.
    Who wants to interrupt this relaxation with hours of cleaning equipment, exchanging felt soles for rubber, navigating waterways to eliminate fishing infected areas, etc. The fly-fisherman will do this happily, because we know what’s at stake.
    What about the rest?

    It is troubling that there are actually individuals alive on this planet that believe that because they cast a fly onto the water, they are somehow more “noble” than let’s say someone opting to drown a worm. American Heritage Dictionary defines noble as 1. Of, in, or belonging to the nobility. 2. Having or showing qualities of high moral character…. 3. Superior in nature or character; exalted: a noble ideal.

    When a person chooses to take up fly fishing, I would like to think they do it because of the challenges and enjoyment they get from all aspects of the sport not because they are looking to become an elite member of the fly fishing fraternity that thinks others don’t care. There is nothing wrong with wanting to fly fish. There is nothing wrong with spending gobs of money to enjoy the sport. There is nothing wrong with buying a Zebco rod and reel at Wal-Mart of $9.95, digging some worms out back and heading down to the local brook and catching the night’s supper. In my opinion both disciplines are “noble” when compared to many other things our society indulges in.

    When we begin assuming attitudes of superiority, nobility and grandeur all because we think we are better than another because of how we choose to fish, it is a sad day for all outdoor sportsmen. We see all too often these days such attitudes more geared for the promotion of our own special interests than for what’s good for all, including the fisheries we all strive to protect.

    For this person to suggest that because he is a member of an elite group of “noble” fishermen, he and his fellow anglers are the only ones who care enough to want to do anything about didymo, is absolutely absurd. It makes you wonder what other thoughts this person has toward his fellow man.

    The most encouraging part of this post comes from the responses that follow. As of this writing there were 11 responses and not one of them agreed. I don’t for one minute believe that the majority or even a small minority of fishermen at Fly Fishing in Maine honestly feel that spinning rod fishermen don’t care whether didymo grows and spreads in New England waters. We all have differing ideas on how best to manage our fisheries and often times, as has been displayed during the latest legislative session, ideas clash and emotions run high. This debate is far better than sportsmen sitting at home not getting involved at all. It shows more and more of us care and are willing to step up to the microphone and be heard. Let the debating continue but posts like this one do absolutely nothing to further the cause of understanding and preventing the spread of this and other invasive species.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 13th August 2007
    Under: Connecticut, Fishing, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Opinion/Commentary, Vermont | 7 Comments »

    Who To Contact About Didymo Sightings In N.H. And Vt.

    The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services has posted a page at their website with contact information as to who to notify should you find outbreaks of the invasive algae, Didymo.

    Sightings in New Hampshire
    NH DES Limnology Center
    29 Hazen Drive
    Concord, NH 03301
    603-271-2248 or 603-271-3414
    asmagula@des.state.nh.us
    or
    jconnor@des.state.nh.us

    Sightings in Vermont
    Didymo identification, Water Quality Division
    103 S. Main St., Bldg 10N, First Floor
    Waterbury VT 05671-0408
    (802) 241 – 3770 or 241 – 3777
    Angela.Shambaugh@state.vt.us
    or
    Leslie.Matthews@state.vt.us

    The site also contains information about the species and what can be done to stop the spread of the deadly algae.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 19th July 2007
    Under: Connecticut, Fishing, Fishing Science, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont | No Comments »

    An New Definition For “In It Up To Your Neck”

    Four workers at a fish farm found themselves mired in fish poop after a bracket holding a filtration pad collapsed. Rescue workers had to cut through the tank to rescue the men who were in there for around 45 minutes.

    The Boston Globe carries the “messy” details.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 12th May 2007
    Under: Fishing, Massachusetts | No Comments »

    Eastern U.S. Strategy For Brook Trout Coservation

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The future of the East’s premier native trout is looking up, thanks to a coalition of state and federal agencies, academic institutions and conservation organizations.

    The Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture today released a first-of-its-kind conservation strategy to restore healthy, fishable populations of eastern brook trout throughout their eastern native range. The Conservation Strategy is based on the status and threats information contained in the Joint Venture’s initial report, which was issued in May 2006.

    The 2006 report found that only 5% of historical brook trout habitat remains intact. Populations have been eliminated or greatly reduced in almost half of the areas that historically supported brook trout. Poor land management practices are responsible for the majority of this decline.

    “Once the partnership recognized the threats facing brook trout within its historic eastern range, we developed regional and range-wide strategies to take swift and deliberate steps to conserve strong populations and restore weaker ones,” said Steve Perry, Inland Fisheries Division Chief for the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department and Chair of the Joint Venture. “We created a model for fish conservation – a large-scale, habitat-focused conservation strategy for a species at risk. This strategy provides us with a roadmap to significantly improve brook trout populations by 2025.”

    The report contains a set of aggressive range-wide and regional targets, including protection of highest quality habitat, improvement of 30% of damaged brook trout watersheds, and reintroduction of brook trout to 10% of those watersheds where they have disappeared. Using the 2006 status and threats data as a baseline, the Joint Venture will evaluate progress toward these targets at five year intervals.

    In conjunction with the range-wide strategy released today, each of the Joint Venture states is developing a specialized plan based on that state’s existing brook trout populations and dominant threats. Through these plans, the states will prioritize protection and restoration efforts to meet the collective targets outlined above. Projects will address priority needs in each state, ranging from restoring streamside habitat in Georgia to cleaning up pollution from abandoned coal mines in Pennsylvania, to fixing road culverts to improve brook trout passage in Maine.

    “The significance of these state efforts really can’t be overstated,” said Gary Berti, Eastern Brook Trout Campaign Coordinator for Trout Unlimited and the Joint Venture’s Communications Chair. “They are the ones who will do the hard work to make this range-wide plan a reality. And they will need support from conservation groups, watershed associations, landowners, businesses, educators, citizens and policy-makers at all levels to accomplish the ambitious goals laid out in this strategy.”

    The Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture partnership began in 2004 as a pilot project under the National Fish Habitat Action Plan. Active partners include fish and wildlife agencies from 17 states, federal agencies, conservation organizations and academic institutions. The Joint Venture is seeking additional partners and support to assist in the protection and restoration of brook trout habitat.

    Brook trout are the only trout native to the streams and rivers of the eastern United States. Once prolific throughout their historical range, brook trout populations have declined as land use changes have altered their habitat. These fish survive in only the coldest and cleanest water, and they serve as excellent indicators of the health of the watersheds they inhabit.

    For more information on the range-wide eastern brook trout conservation strategy and state-specific plans, please visit http://www.easternbrooktrout.net.

    This press release was sent to me by the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 7th March 2007
    Under: Connecticut, Fishing, Fishing Politics, Fishing Science, Georgia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia | No Comments »

    Becket Dam Coming Down

    The Ballou Dam in Becket, Massachusetts is coming down. The Boston Globe reports on the progress of the demolition and what it means to locals and fishermen.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 21st December 2006
    Under: Fishing, Massachusetts | No Comments »

    Trout Unlimited Looks At New Englands Water Sources

    Trout Unlimited has issued a report called, “A Glass Half Full: The Future of Water in New England”. This report takes a look at the future of water resources to support aquatic life in the New England area. As the demand for water grows, TU feels that guidelines need to be drawn up now to deal with over use of water that threatens our fisheries. The report addresses what TU sees as problems and makes recommendations on how to deal with them.

    The full report is available by clicking this link. On this page, you will be able to download the full report. It is a pdf.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 18th December 2006
    Under: Connecticut, Fishing, Fishing Science, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont | No Comments »

    Red Tide Closes New Hampshire Waters

    ATLANTIC COAST SHELLFISHING CLOSED BECAUSE OF “RED TIDE”

    CONCORD, N.H. — To protect the public from the possible consumption of
    contaminated shellfish, officials from the New Hampshire Department of
    Environmental Services and the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department
    have closed the offshore/open ocean areas of the Atlantic to the taking
    of shellfish until further notice. This action is in response to
    elevated levels of Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning or PSP, commonly known as
    “red tide,” detected in blue mussels collected from the Isles of
    Shoals on May 8, 2006.

    All New Hampshire tidal waters, including the offshore Atlantic waters,
    have actually been closed since May 2 and 3, 2006, following several
    days of heavy rainfall. Since the May 2-3 closure, an offshore bloom of
    the marine algae that causes PSP toxicity in shellfish has begun to
    affect the area. Blue mussels from Star Island collected on May 8, 2006,
    showed toxin levels above the mandatory closure threshold of 80
    micrograms toxin per 100 grams shellfish tissue. Thus, the closure affecting
    open ocean areas, which are primarily used for commercial aquaculture of
    blue mussels, will remain in effect until further notice.

    Blue mussels collected from the Hampton/Seabrook estuary, a popular
    recreational shellfish harvesting location, showed a slight rise in PSP
    toxin levels over last week, but did not exceed the 80 microgram limit.
    The area will be re-tested later this week. Until that time, the closure
    implemented last week for all tidal waters will remain in effect.

    Updates on the open/closed status of all areas, including
    Hampton/Seabrook, Little Harbor, Great Bay, Little Bay, the Bellamy River, and the
    nearshore areas of the Atlantic Coast will be announced on the Clam Flat
    Hotline (1-800-43-CLAMS) by Friday afternoon, May 12, 2006.

    Red tide is a condition in which filter-feeding shellfish such as
    clams, oysters, and mussels accumulate a potent neurotoxin produced by a
    naturally occurring marine algae. Cooking does not make contaminated
    shellfish safe for consumption. For more information, consult the NHDES
    Shellfish Program website at http://des.nh.gov/wmb/shellfish.

    - ### -


    Copyright 2006 New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, 11 Hazen Drive,
    Concord, NH 03301. Comments or questions concerning this list should
    be directed to lpoinier@wildlife.state.nh.us.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 10th May 2006
    Under: Fishing, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire | 2 Comments »

    Trout Stocking Underway

    This week, MassWildlife staff will be busy stocking waters across the state of Massachussets. With the warmer weather in the forecast, officials believe most of the remaining ice in ponds and streams will be gone and it shouldn’t hamper their efforts to get the fish out.

    A total of 636,000 trout will be dumped into lakes, rivers and streams with the majority of those trout being rainbow trout. They will vary in sizes from six inches to 18 inches on some of the broodstock brook trout.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 13th March 2006
    Under: Fishing, Massachusetts | No Comments »

    Fish Stocking This Week in Massachusetts

    If the weather permits, trout stocking should be taking place this week across much of the Bay State. Around 636,000 brook, rainbow, brown and tiger trout are set to be released into waters around the state.

    The rainbow trout will range in sizes from 6 – over a foot. Browns will range in the 6 – 12 inch range as well as brookies. The tiger trout, a cross between a female brown trout and a male brook trout, will be stocked in the 14 plus size and they say they are fiesty and fun to catch.

    Tom Remington

    Posted on 1st March 2006
    Under: Fishing, Massachusetts | No Comments »